Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 689 F.3d 818 - Lox v. CDA, Ltd.

Lox v. CDA, Ltd.’s Empirical Analysis

689 F.3d 818 · 2012

Citation profile

42
cited by 42 later decisions
April 2023
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692E (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act)

Relies on Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co. · Walker v. National Recovery, Inc. · Donohue v. Quick Collect, Inc. · Hahn v. Triumph Partnerships LLC · Ruth v. Triumph Partnerships

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 42 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “As an outgrowth of this practice, we have determined that there are three categories of § 1692e cases. The first category includes cases in which the allegedly offensive language is plainly and clearly not misleading. In cases of this nature, no extrinsic evidence is needed to show that the reasonable unsophisticated consumer would not be confused by the pertinent language. The second category of cases includes debt collection language that is not misleading or confusing on its face, but has the potential to be misleading to the unsophisticated consumer. If a case falls into this category, we have held that plaintiffs may prevail only by producing extrinsic evidence, such as consumer surveys, to prove that unsophisticated consumers do in fact find the challenged statements misleading or deceptive. The final category includes cases involving letters that are plainly deceptive or misleading, and therefore do not require any extrinsic evidence in order for the plaintiff to be successful.”
    6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “§ 1692e. False or misleading representations A debt collector may not use any false, deceptive, or misleading representation or means in connection with the collection of any debt. Without limiting the general application of the foregoing, the following conduct is a violation of this section: [[Image here]] (2) The false representation of— (A) the character, amount, or legal status of any debt;... (10) The use of any false representation or deceptive means to collect or attempt to collect any debt or to obtain information concerning a consumer.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Upon receipt of the settlement amount and clearance of funds, and if we are reporting the account, the appropriate credit bureaus will be notified that this account has been settled .”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.