Crye Precision LLC v. Duro Textiles, LLC’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1125 (§ 43 of the Trademark Act of 1946 (Lanham Act)) · 28 U.S.C. § 1498
Relies on Polaroid Corp. v. Polarad Electronics Corp. · Paddington Corporation v. Attiki Importers & Distributors Inc · Jeffrey Milstein, Inc. v. Greger, Lawlor, Roth, Inc. · Law Debenture Trust Co. v. Maverick Tube Corp. · Nora Beverages Inc v. The Perrier Group of America Inc
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“if the movant shows that there is no genuine dispute as to any material fact and the movant is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[T]o show bad faith, a plaintiff must show that the defendant intended to create confusion between the products or marks at issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Fischer v. Forrest“See BDO Seidman, 93 N.Y.2d at 388 -89 , 690 N.Y.S.2d 854 , 712 N.E.2d 1220 (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.