Starobin v. Randolph Computer Corp.’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Relies on 13 Cal. 3d 622 - Rossmoor Sanitation, Inc. v. Pylon, Inc. · Margolin v. New York Life Insurance · Hogeland v. Sibley · Faser v. Sears, Roebuck & Co. · Ralph M. Parsons Co. v. Combustion Equipment Associates, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is not necessary that an indemnitee have sustained actual damages in the main action in order to be entitled to enforce an agreement as to indemnification for attorneys' fees.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.