Poole v. Bowen’s Empirical Analysis
1988
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
November 2015
most recently cited
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2412 · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Watford v. Heckler · Guido v. Schweiker
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““whenever a court renders a judgment favorable to a claimant under this title who was represented before the court by ah attorney ... [in an amount] not in excess of 25 percent of the total of the past-due benefits to which the claimant is entitled by reason of such judgment, and the Secretary may ... certify the amount of such fee for payment to such attorney out of, and not in addition to, the amount of such past-due benefits.” - 42 U.S.C. § 406 (b)(1) (1988 & Supp.1993).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Hanrahan v. Shalala
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.