Hall v. Sebelius’s Empirical Analysis
2009
Citation profile
14 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1395 (§ 1801 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 401 (§ 201 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 426 (§ 226 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Mathews v. Eldridge · Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an agency ... has made known that its general views are contrary to those of the complainant, and has never given an inkling that it would consider a matter afreshf.]”).) 16 . Beattie alleges that he would be irreparably harmed if the court does not”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“exhaustion may be excused where 'an agency has adopted a policy or pursued a practice of general applicability that is contrary to the law'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.