Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 689 FSUPP2D 825 - Jones v. Baugher

Jones v. Baugher’s Empirical Analysis

2010

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
May 2014
most recently cited

2 district ·

Relationships

Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1692 (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692A (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692E (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692G (Fair Debt Collection Practices Act) · 15 U.S.C. § 1692K (Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1367

Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Saudi Basic Industries Corp. · Francis v. Giacomelli

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.