Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 689 N.E.2d 452 - Sutton v. State

Sutton v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
October 1999
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Pruitt v. Indiana · Greer v. State · Menifee v. State · King v. State · Payne v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “this [45-day] provision was not designed to limit the State’s ability to file a petition to revoke during the probationary period. Rather, the statute merely requires the trial court to inform a probationer that the State may file a petition to revoke, even if the probationary term is ended, if it does so within the time limits outlined above. As such, the forty-five day filing requirement applies only if a defendant’s probation has ended and the State has notice that the defendant violated his probation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.