Riggs v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1997
Citation profile
4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
June 1999
most recently cited
4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Marsillett v. State · Madden v. State · Moffatt v. State · Summers v. State · State v. Winters
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“or other evidence” after deliberations have begun and requires that the jury be returned to the courtroom. 3 American Bar Association, Standards for Criminal Justice (2d ed.1980). 6 . Although stating this general constitutional proposition, Cape itself focused on the fact that neither the defendant nor defense counsel was present—nor had either been given notice—when the trial court replayed certain portions of trial testimony requested by the jury. Indiana Code § 34-1-21-6 specifically required the replaying of testimony only “in the presence of, or after notice to, the parties or their attorneys.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Robinson v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.