Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 689 NW2D 214 - Duder v. Shanks

Duder v. Shanks’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
June 2018
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Hoefer v. Wisconsin Education Ass'n Insurance Trust · Soo Line Railroad v. Iowa Department of Transportation · Bartsch v. Bartsch · Brichacek v. Hiskey · Talbot v. Talbot

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[j]udicial estoppel also applies when inconsistent positions otherwise meeting the requirements of this doctrine are taken in the same proceeding.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “the successful assertion of the inconsistent position in a prior action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.