Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 689 N.W.2d 247 - State v. Johnson

State v. Johnson’s Empirical Analysis

2004

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
June 2013
most recently cited

6 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Apprendi v. New Jersey · Blakely v. Washington · Katz v. United States · Minnesota v. Olson · Dorman v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “a Lothenbach proceeding does not involve a guilty plea. A true Lothenbach stipulation does not involve a concession of guilt, and is intended only to preserve the defendant’s right of appeal while avoiding an unnecessary jury trial. We therefore disagree with appellant’s contention that an agreement to a stipulated-facts trial is the functional equivalent of a guilty plea[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.