Rydberg v. Goodno’s Empirical Analysis
2004
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 2014
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Fidelity Bank & Trust Co. v. Fitzimons · Johnson v. Noot · Hince v. O'KEEFE · County of Hennepin v. Levine · Piotter v. Steffen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The party having [the burden of going forward with the evidence] must introduce some evidence if he wishes to get a certain issue into the case. If he introduces enough evidence to require consideration of this issue, this burden has been met.’’ Rollin M. Perkins & Ronald N. Boyce, Criminal Law, 78 (3d ed.1982), quoted in Black's Law Dictionary 223 (9th ed.2009). 4 . The ambiguous term”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Coker v. Ludeman
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.