Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 689 SO2D 1004 - Lasner v. State

Lasner v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1996

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited

15 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Tucker · Bartone v. United States · In re Disbarment of Carnow · 47 Ala. App. 65 - Ireland v. State · United States v. Woodall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'The record must affirmatively show the colloquy between the court and the defendant wherein the defendant is shown to have a full understanding of what the plea of guilty connotes and its consequences.' Walcott v. State , 48 Ala. App. 754 , 263 So.2d 177 (Ala.Cr.App.), 288 Ala. 546 , 547 , 263 So.2d 178 (Ala. 1972). This colloquy may be supplemented, however, by a validly executed Ireland form if the trial court ascertains, on the record, that the accused has read and understood the rights enumerated in that form. Twyman v. State , 293 Ala. 75 , 300 So.2d 124 (1974); Cashin v. State , 428 So.2d 179 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); McNalley v. State , 468 So.2d 209 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Explanation of Rights and Plea of Guilty”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.