Lasner v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
June 2002
most recently cited
15 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Tucker · Bartone v. United States · In re Disbarment of Carnow · 47 Ala. App. 65 - Ireland v. State · United States v. Woodall
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'The record must affirmatively show the colloquy between the court and the defendant wherein the defendant is shown to have a full understanding of what the plea of guilty connotes and its consequences.' Walcott v. State , 48 Ala. App. 754 , 263 So.2d 177 (Ala.Cr.App.), 288 Ala. 546 , 547 , 263 So.2d 178 (Ala. 1972). This colloquy may be supplemented, however, by a validly executed Ireland form if the trial court ascertains, on the record, that the accused has read and understood the rights enumerated in that form. Twyman v. State , 293 Ala. 75 , 300 So.2d 124 (1974); Cashin v. State , 428 So.2d 179 (Ala.Cr.App. 1982); McNalley v. State , 468 So.2d 209 (Ala.Cr.App. 1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Explanation of Rights and Plea of Guilty”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.