Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

689 So. 2d 1124

Rochetti v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 1997

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-02-14

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 2010

2 state decisions

Relies on 667 So. 2d 933 - Golden v. State · J.E.P. v. State

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-02-14

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1In this Anders appeal, the trial court orally imposed “standard costs” without any reference to authority or amount. The probation order included $250 for investigative costs and $150 for law enforcement investigative costs. There is no oral or written request in the record for such costs, no documentation to support the costs, and no finding of Ro-ehetti’s ability to pay these costs. The costs were imposed without compliance with section 939.01, Florida Statutes (1995) and must be stricken. See Adams v. State, 676 So.2d 541 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996); Golden v. State, 667 So.2d 933 (Fla. 2d DCA 1996).

¶2JUDGMENT, SENTENCE and PROBATION ORDER AFFIRMED; CONDITIONS 17 AND 18 STRICKEN.

PETERSON, C.J., and GOSHORN and HARRIS, JJ., concur.
/689/so2d/1124 · .json · Public domain