Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

689 So. 2d 1312

Docket No. 96-2416.

Smith v. Smith

Steven Daniel SMITH, Appellant, v. Rebecca Jane SMITH, Appellee.

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-03-27

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently August 2009

4 state decisions

Relies on Rausch v. Rausch

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1997-03-27

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Peter Cushing, Orlando, for Appellant.

¶2Henry L. Perla, Orlando, for Appellee.

¶3PER CURIAM.

¶4The judgment of dissolution of marriage is reversed, except for that portion dissolving the marriage, based on the trial court's failure to make the specific findings of fact mandated by subsection 61.08(1), Florida Statutes (1995). See Rausch v. Rausch, 680 So.2d 624 (Fla. 5th DCA 1996). We note that there is no provision in the law for "nonmodifiable permanent alimony" and order that provision stricken upon remand.[1]

¶5REVERSED and REMANDED with instructions.

¶6W. SHARP, GOSHORN and ANTOON, JJ., concur.

NOTES

¶7[1] The final judgment was signed by the Honorable Robert M. Evans, Circuit Judge of the Ninth Judicial Circuit.

/689/so2d/1312 · .json · Public domain