689 So. 2d 239 - Henyard v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1996
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 70 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 77 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 202 So. 3d 40 - Timothy Lee Hurst v. State of Florida (2016), 714 So. 2d 411 - Urbin v. State (1998)
3 federal appellate · 70 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Gregg v. Georgia · American Manufacturers Mutual Insurance v. United States · Soberon v. United States · Needler v. Valley National Bank of Arizona · Murphy v. Florida
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 77 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a jury is neither compelled nor required to recommend death where aggravating factors outweigh mitigating factors.”
7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]o qualify as an excited utterance, the statement must be made: (1) “regarding an event startling enough to cause ner vous excitement”; (2) “before there was time to contrive or misrepresent”; and (3) “while the person was under the stress or excitement caused by the event.””
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Knowledge of the incident because of its notoriety is not, in and of itself, grounds for a change of venue. The test for determining a change of venue is whether the general state of mind of the inhabitants of a community is so infected by knowledge of the incident and accompanying prejudice, bias, and preconceived opinions that jurors could not possibly put these matters out of their minds and try the case solely upon the evidence presented in the courtroom.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.