¶1The defendant, Paleno Estrada, challenges his judgment and sentence for aggravated battery. After a review of the record in accordance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967), we affirm the defendant’s conviction. We strike, however, that portion of probation condition 9 requiring Mr. Estrada to pay for random drug and alcohol testing because it is a special condition that was not orally announced at sentencing. Luby v. State, 648 So.2d 308 (Fla. 2d DCA 1995). We affirm the sentence in all other respects.
689 So. 2d 372
Estrada v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided February 21, 1997
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1997-02-21
Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently January 2004
14 state decisions
Relies on Anders v. California · 648 So. 2d 308 - Luby v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1997-02-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →