Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 689 SW2D 294 - Scherlie v. State

Scherlie v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1985

Citation profile

11
cited by 11 later decisions
2
states following
June 2005
most recently cited

11 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently June 2005

11 state decisions

90198519902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 158 Tex. Crim. 313 - Hill v. State · Forte v. State · Eckman v. State · Goswick v. State · Epperson v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The definition of “intoxicated” in Article 6701l-1(a)(2)(b) does not give rise to any presumption of intoxication; an alcohol concentration of 0.10% constitutes intoxication standing alone. It is a separate, independent, additional way in which the crime of driving while intoxicated may be committed. It is not a presumption at all, much less an irrebuttable presumption. It is the ultimate fact to be determined in litigation.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “once it is shown that the defendant had an alcohol concentration of 0.10% or more, there is nothing for the jury to presume.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.