State v. Berkwit’s Empirical Analysis
1985
Citation profile
6 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently January 2011
6 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Leon · Carroll v. United States · Chimel v. California · Chambers v. Maroney · United States v. Ross
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The exception recognized in [U.S. v.] Leon [ 468 U.S. 897 , 104 S.Ct. 3405 , 82 L.Ed.2d 677 (1984) ] and [Massachusetts v.] Sheppard [ 468 U.S. 981 , 104 S.Ct. 3424 , 82 L.Ed.2d 737 (1984)] applies when the defendant relies on the Fourth Amendment to quash seized evidence. Here we are concerned with a violation of statutes which rendered the warrant invalid. No authority has been cited and we find none to support the application of the ‘good faith’ exception to excuse a failure to comply with search warrant statutes. We may not ignore the legislative provisions defining an invalid search warrant.” State v. Berkwit, 689 S.W.2d 763, 766 (Mo.App.1985).”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Gannaway
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.