Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 A3D 1007 - O'Riley v. Rogers

O'Riley v. Rogers’s Empirical Analysis

2013

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
2
states following
January 2015
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Palace Bar, Inc. v. Fearnot · Robinson v. Meding · Riegel v. Aastad Ex Rel. Aastad · 223 N.J. Super. 92 - State v. Freeman · South Atlantic Steamship Co. v. Munkacsy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “when an expert offers a medical opinion it should be stated in terms of ‘a reasonable medical probability’ or 'a reasonable medical certainty' and [a] doctor cannot base his expert medical opinion on speculation or conjecture.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.