¶1*856Contrary to the mother’s contention, the Family Court’s finding that she neglected the child by inflicting excessive corporal punishment is supported by a preponderance of the evidence (see Family Ct Act § 1046 [b] [i]; § 1012 [f] [i] [B]; Matter of Isaiah S., 63 AD3d 948 [2009]; Matter of Daniel W, 56 AD3d 483 [2008]; Matter of Fred Darryl B., 41 AD3d 276 [2007]).
¶2The mother’s remaining contentions are without merit. Fisher, J.E, Miller, Eng and Hall, JJ., concur.