¶1The question raised by this record was decided *227adversely to appellant in Ulmer v. The State, 61 Ala. 208, and in Powell v. The State, ante 10. See, also, Elam v. The State, 25 Ala. 53.
¶2Affirmed.
69 Ala. 226
Boon v. State
Decided December 15, 1881
Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1881-12-15
Tried before' Hon. James E. Cobb. The indictment in this case charged that the defendant “ did sell vinous or spirituous liquors without a license and contrary to law.” The evidence on the trial disclosed that under and in pursuance of an act of the General Assembly, authorizing elections to be held in the county of Randolph and other counties therein named, for the purpose of prohibiting the sale or other ■disposition of vinous or spirituous liquors within certain limits in…
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently May 1932
1 state decisions
Relies on Elam v. State · Ulmer v. State
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1881-12-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →