Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 ARK 599 - Williams v. State

Williams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1901

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
2
states following
May 2005
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently May 2005

8 state decisions

3019011910192019301940195019601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Corley v. State · Love v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"... There has been much discussion among jurists as what part of a confession should be offered in evidence by the plaintiff, and what part by the defendant, and at what stage of the trial each part should be presented; but there is no difference among them on the proposition that the whole of the confession should be admitted, at least so much of the statement including it as is relevant." (Emphasis added)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.