Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 ARKAPP 243 - Burdyshaw v. State

Burdyshaw v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
3
states following
October 2018
most recently cited

13 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Oliver v. United States · United States v. Smith · Humphrey v. State · Norris v. State · United States v. Ventling

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The absence of a closed or blocked gate in this country creates an invitation to the public that a person can lawfully enter along the driveway during daylight hours to contact the occupants for a lawful request and if the request is refused to leave by the same way. The presence of “no trespassing” signs in this country without a locked or closed gate makes the entry along the driveway for the purposes above described not a trespass and therefore does not constitute an intrusion prohibited by the Fourth Amendment.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “gates were open[ and] the driveway was not blocked”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.