In Re Faughn’s Empirical Analysis
1986
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 11 U.S.C. § 362 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 28 U.S.C. § 1334 · 28 U.S.C. § 157
Relies on Pristas v. Landaus of Plymouth, Inc. · Matthews v. Transamerica Financial Services
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““When a purchase money interest is claimed by a secured party who is not a seller, he must of course have given present consideration. This Section therefore provides that the purchase money party must be one who gives value ‘by making advances or incurring an obligation:’ the quoted language excludes from the purchase money category any security interest taken as security for or in satisfaction of a pre-existing claim or antecedent debt.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.