Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 BR 586 - In Re Morrison

In Re Morrison’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

49
cited by 49 later decisions
November 2018
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 49 later decisions — most recently November 2018 · most notably Kowal v. Malkemus (1992), In Re Brantz (1989)

1 federal appellate · 1 district ·

2101987199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 502 · 11 U.S.C. § 506 · 11 U.S.C. § 522 · 11 U.S.C. § 544 · 11 U.S.C. § 705

Relies on Keeble v. United States · Smith v. Harmsen · Goldman v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc. · Cosoff v. Rodman · Newman v. Stein

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 49 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the needs of orderly and expeditious administration do not permit the full and unfettered exercise of [a creditor's] right to object to the allowance of another creditor's claim. The most important qualification attached to the right of a creditor to object is that it is the trustee who acts as the spokesman for all the creditors in discharge of the trustee's duty unless the trustee refuses to take action.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.