Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 Cal. 2d 550 - People v. Hill

69 Cal. 2d 550 - People v. Hill’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

151
cited by 151 later decisions
6
cited 6 times by the Supreme Court
5
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 128 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 151 later decisions (6 by the Supreme Court) — most recently August 2018 · most notably Illinois v. Rodriguez (1990), Hill v. California (1971)

8 federal appellate · 3 district · 128 state decisions

720196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Beck v. State of Ohio · Harris v. United States · Stoner v. California · 62 Cal. 2d 338 - People v. Dorado

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 151 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen the police have probable cause to arrest one party, and when they reasonably mistake a second party for the first party, then the arrest of the second party is a valid arrest.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[T]he officers were justified in concluding that Stevens had the authority over his home that he purported to have, and there was nothing unreasonable in their acting accordingly. In this proceeding we are not concerned with enforcing defendant’s rights under the law of trespass and landlord and tenant but with discouraging unreasonable activity on the part of law enforcement officers. * * * [Wjhen * * * the officers have acted in good faith with the consent and at the request of a home owner in conducting a search, evidence so obtained cannot be excluded merely because the officers may have made a reasonable mistake as to the extent of the owner’s authority.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[A] search is not unreasonable if made with the consent of a third party whom the police reasonably and in good faith believe has authority to consent to their search....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.