Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 CALAPP2D 574 - Benway v. Benway

Benway v. Benway’s Empirical Analysis

1945

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
3
states following
February 2014
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently February 2014 · most notably 115 Cal. App. 2d 92 - Smith v. Smith (1952), 87 Cal. App. 2d 126 - Lámar v. Superior Court (1948)

3 federal appellate · 35 state decisions

14019451950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on De la Montanya v. De la Montanya · Crim v. Kessing · Estate of Goldberg · Reynolds v. Reynolds · Kaufman v. Shain

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is for the judge who made the original decision to decide whether the judgment as written expresses his decision. ... In action upon the matter the judge is exercising one of the functions of his judicial office and he will not direct the amendment unless he is satisfied that the original entry does not clearly express the order which was made. “ ‘It was for the trial judge to determine whether the order was complete and all that he intended it to be or whether it was deficient. If the mistake was clerical, it could be corrected. If it was judicial, it could not be. It must be presumed that he found it to be his own clerical error; otherwise he would have had no right to make the second order. The facts were completely and solely within his own knowledge. He alone knew whether a mistake had been made and how it had been made. He had a right to rely upon his own memory . . . and his determination of the fact is conclusive. ’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.