State v. Spillane’s Empirical Analysis

Citation profile

9 state decisions

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

1. “(Internal quotation marks omitted.) Id. In the present case, the defendant neither preserved the claim at trial, nor requested review of the claim under Golding or the plain error doctrine. Therefore, we decline to review the claim. The judgment is affirmed. In this opinion the other judges concurred. NOTES [1] General Statutes § 53a-92(a) provides in relevant part:”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Epps

2. “Where a defendant fails to seek review of an unpreserved claim under either [ State v. Golding, 213 Conn. 233, 239-40 , 567 A.2d 823 (1989)] or the plain error doctrine [set forth in Practice Book § 60-5], this court will not examine such a claim.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Epps

3. “Where a defendant fails to seek review of an unpreserved claim under either Golding or the plain error doctrine, this court will not examine such a claim.”

   1 later decision quote this exact passage
   e.g. State v. Epps