State v. Faraday’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on North Carolina v. Alford · Gagnon v. Scarpelli · Austin Products Co. v. Workers' Compensation Insurers Rating Association of Minnesota · Mabry v. Johnson · Paul v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The Court: So it’s no unsupervised contact with a child under the age of sixteen. The supervisor cannot be somebody who he is romantically involved with, but his present situation is an exception to that. “[Assistant State’s Attorney]: As long as the [department . . . finds that that’s an appropriate level of contact that he has with that child. “The Court: So he can stay with that relationship unless [the department] says otherwise— “[Assistant State’s Attorney]: Yes.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Faraday
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.