Concord Electronics Corp. v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 19 U.S.C. § 1500 (Tariff Act of 1930)
Relies on United States v. Brechner · United States v. Supreme Merchandise Co. · Valley Knitting Co. v. United States · United States v. Knit Wits · A. Zerkowitz & Co. v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is no evidence to show what the appraising officer did except that he placed a red check mark in the column headed “Appraised” on the summary sheet, thus indicating that the appraised value agreed with the entered value. (P. 244.) [Italic added.]”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“even if the commissions are bona fide buying commissions, they may not be deducted from the appraised values in order to establish different dutiable values, in the absence of evidence of all the elements of export value * * *. (Pp. 246-247.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.