Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 F.2d 461

Docket No. 5028.

Dixon v. Commissioner

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided March 15, 1934.

Rehearing Denied April 14, 1934.

Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1934-03-15

2 counsel of record

Relies on Laflin v. Commissioner

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1934-03-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1972

2 federal appellate · 1 state decisions

2019341940195019601970decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Elwood G. Godman, of Chicago, Ill., for petitioner.

¶2Pat Malloy, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewall Key and John MaeC. Hudson, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (Edward II. McDermott, Charles 0. Parker, and Marcus Whiting, all of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for respondent.

¶3Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and FITZHENRY, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The instant appeal presents fact and law questions so similar to Laflin v. Commission*462er, 69 F.(2d) 460, this day decided by this court, that we deem it unnecessary to elaborate our reasons therein given for affirming the order of the Board of Tax Appeals. The decision in that ease is controlling.

¶6The order of the Board of Tax Appeals is affirmed.

/69/f2d/461 · .json · Public domain