Schodde v. United States’s Empirical Analysis
69 F.2d 866 · 1934
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently January 1984
2 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 43 U.S.C. § 373 · 43 U.S.C. § 501
Relies on United States v. Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway Co. · Hefner v. Northwestern Mut Life Ins Co · Custer v. McCutcheon · Foltz v. St. Louis & S. F. Ry. Co. · Lyon v. Perin & Gafe Manufacturing Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““. . . The time limited for issuing executions is, strictly speaking, not a statute of limitations. On the contrary, the privilege of issuing an execution is merely to be exercised within a specified time, as are other procedural steps in the course of a litigation after it is instituted. The plaintiff is not precluded from bringing an action upon the judgment, but merely from having an execution in the form provided by state law.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.