Nowicki v. Ullsvik’s Empirical Analysis
69 F.3d 1320 · 1995
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently July 2019
5 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act)) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Dennis v. Sparks · Mireles v. Waco · U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall Partnership · Barrows v. Jackson · Pulliam v. Allen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“an unconstitutional law. 2. Substantive Due Process 10 Khan also alleges that the defendants violated her rights under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Section One of the Fourteenth Amendment provides:”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Khan v. Gallitano“is directed against legislative action only”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.