Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 F.3d 27 - United States v. Williams

United States v. Williams’s Empirical Analysis

69 F.3d 27 · 1995

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
8
states following
November 2015
most recently cited

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently November 2015 · most notably United States v. Kennedy (1997), 82 Wash. App. 594 - State v. Jackson (1996)

25 federal appellate · 2 district · 9 state decisions

320199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on National Union Fire Insurance v. Helfand · Messerschmidt v. United States · Coston v. Bank of Malvern · United States v. Diaz · United States v. Daniel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Because a showing of a dog’s reliability is unnecessary with regard to obtaining a search warrant, a fortiori, a showing of a dog’s reliability is not required if probable cause is developed on site as a result of a dog sniff of a vehicle.”); United States v. Gonzalez-Acosta, 989 F.2d at 388-389 ( The false/positive-negative alert records and”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “ ‘standard of review for a motion to suppress based on live testimony at a suppression hearing is to accept the trial court’s factual findings unless clearly erroneous or influenced by an incorrect view of the law.’ ”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “The fact that the dog alerted provided probable cause to search.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.