Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 F.3d 28 - Al-Ra'id v. Ingle

Al-Ra'id v. Ingle’s Empirical Analysis

69 F.3d 28 · 1995

Citation profile

69
cited by 69 later decisions
November 2017
most recently cited

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently November 2017 · most notably Sossamon v. Lone Star (2009), Cozzo v. Tangipahoa Parish Council-President Government (2002)

12 federal appellate · 1 district ·

330199520002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Harlow v. Fitzgerald · Parratt v. Taylor · Hudson v. Palmer · Sandin v. Conner · Reginald R. Brinkmann, Jr. v. Dallas County Deputy Sheriff Abner

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘In assessing qualified immunity, we engage in a two-step analysis. First, we determine whether a plaintiff has alleged the violation of a clearly established constitutional right under the current state of the law.’ R.A.M. Al-Ra’id v. Ingle, 69 F.3d 28 , 31 (5th Cir.1995). ‘Second, if the plaintiff has alleged such a constitutional violation, we decide whether this defendant’s conduct was “objectively reasonable,” measured by reference to the law as clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct.’ Id. at 31 (internal citations omitted).””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Second, if the plaintiff has alleged such a constitutional violation, we decide whether this defendant's conduct was 'objectively reasonable,' measured by reference to the law as clearly established at the time of the challenged conduct.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “has effectively abandoned his claim by failing to brief it”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.