Marquez-Ramos v. Reno’s Empirical Analysis
69 F.3d 477 · 1995
Citation profile
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 26 later decisions — most recently March 2017 · most notably 196 W. Va. 208 - State Ex Rel. Cooper v. Caperton (1996), United States v. Nai Fook Li (2000)
8 federal appellate · 1 district · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 4100 · 18 U.S.C. § 4102 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361
Relies on Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal. · William Marbury v. James Madison · Heckler v. Ringer · Sisson v. Ruby · Air France v. Saks
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 26 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Should the language of a treaty prove to be unclear or ambiguous, we may look beyond the written words to the history of the treaty, the negotiations, and the practical construction adopted by the parties.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kass v. Reno L“[I]n interpreting a treaty, ... we start with the text of the treaty and the context in which the written words are used.... Where the text is clear, we interpret it as written.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kass v. Reno L“prerequisites [for a writ of mandamus] have been met, a court still exercises its own discretion in deciding whether or not to issue the writ.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.