Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 F.3d 542

Docket No. 95-2157.

Tidwell v. City

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted: October 26, 1995. Filed: November 1, 1995.

Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1995-10-26

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 2000E (§ 701 of the Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964)

Relies on United States v. Forbes

Opinion by Per Curiam · Decided 1995-10-26

NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

Before BOWMAN, BEAM, and MURPHY, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

Cozetta Tidwell appeals the district court's1 grant of summary judgment for defendant City of Little Rock in her race discrimination claim under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. Sec. 2000e et seq. Having carefully reviewed the record and the parties' briefs, we reject Tidwell's arguments and conclude that no error of fact or law appears. Accordingly, we affirm the district court's judgment for the reasons set forth in its order. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

¶2

Tidwell's motion to supplement the record on appeal is denied.

/69/f3d/542 · .json · Public domain