Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 F.3d 606

Docket Nos. 95-7014, 95-7033.

Smith v. Haden

United States Court of Appeals,

Decided November 21, 1995

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 2006

1 district · 2 state decisions

Relies on 872 F. Supp. 1040 - Smith v. Haden

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1995-11-21

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

District of Columbia Circuit.
Nov. 21, 1995.

On Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.

Before: EDWARDS, Chief Judge; HENDERSON and ROGERS, Circuit Judges.JUDGMENT

¶1

This case was heard on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs and arguments by counsel. Upon consideration thereof, it is

¶2

Ordered that the judgment from which this appeal has been taken be affirmed substantially for the reasons stated in the district court's memorandum opinion of December 23, 1994. See Smith v. Haden, 872 F.Supp. 1040 (D.D.C.1994). The cross-appeal is therefore moot.

¶3

The clerk is directed to withhold issuance of the mandate herein until seven days after disposition of any timely petition for rehearing. See D.C.Cir.Rule 41(a)(1).

/69/f3d/606 · .json · Public domain