Hope v. Cortines’s Empirical Analysis
69 F.3d 687 · 1995
Citation profile
15 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 70 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably Taylor v. Vermont Department of Education (2002), Polera v. Board of Education of the Newburgh Enlarged City School District (2002)
15 federal appellate · 9 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975) · 20 U.S.C. § 1415 · 42 U.S.C. § 12101 (§ 2 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990)
Relies on Hope v. Cortines
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 70 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“determined that the relief plaintiffs seek is available under the IDEA,”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“to obtain relief that is available under the IDEA.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.