Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 F.3d 742 - United States v. Meeks

United States v. Meeks’s Empirical Analysis

69 F.3d 742 · 1995

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
November 2004
most recently cited

11 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 656 · 18 U.S.C. § 657

Relies on Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. Hodory · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain · Perrin v. United States · Neshewat v. Hagstrom · Blasius v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “employees of an independent contractor that provided the bank with a necessary service, which required (and permitted) its employees to be in a restricted area of the bank.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “must presume that a legislature says in a statute what it means and means in a statute what it says there.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “to preserve and protect the assets of banks having a federal relationship.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.