Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 F.3d 746 - Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Central Louisiana Electric Co.

Cajun Electric Power Cooperative, Inc. v. Central Louisiana Electric Co.’s Empirical Analysis

69 F.3d 746 · 1995

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
July 2023
most recently cited

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently July 2023 · most notably In re Marvel Entertainment Group, Inc. (1998), American Preferred Prescription Inc Kenneth Silverman Esq v. Tracar Sa (2001)

10 federal appellate · 2 district ·

1201995200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 101 (Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention and Consumer Protection Act of 2005) · 11 U.S.C. § 1104 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291 · 28 U.S.C. § 158 · 7 U.S.C. § 901 (Rural Electrification Act of 1936) · 7 U.S.C. § 904

Relies on Mahan & Rowsey, Inc. v. Oklahoma Natural Gas · Darden v. Wainwright · A.H. Robins Co. v. Piccinin · Piccinin v. A. H. Robins Co. · Fryzel v. Cash Currency Exchange, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[Bjecause of considerations unique to bankruptcy appeals — such as the protracted nature of bankruptcy proceedings and the large number of parties interested in them — courts have applied liberalized rules of finality for bankruptcy appeals. The appellees, citing Matter of Hawaii Corp., argue that these liberalized rules apply only to appeals from a district court’s review of a bankruptcy court’s decision pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (d) (“Section 158(d)”), not to appeals from a district court sitting in bankruptcy pursuant to Section 1291. Other circuits, however, have refused to follow Matter of Hawaii Corp. ... We too see no reason to apply different rules of finality for Section 1291 appeals, and will apply the same rules that we apply to Section 158(d) appeals.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “this is a large messy bankruptcy that promises to get worse without a disinterested administrator at the helm.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  3. “directly and adversely affected pecuniarily by”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.