In the Matter of John a Maurice Appeal of Kenneth a Kozel’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2014
5 federal appellate · 1 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Chambers v. Nasco, Inc. · Roadway Express, Inc. v. Piper · State v. Simpson · Crawford Fitting Company v. Jt Gibbons Inc Champion International Corporation · Young v. United States Ex Rel. Vuitton Et Fils S. A.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It is intolerable for a member of this court's bar to thumb his nose at the judicial system [by refusing to pay sanctions for misconduct]. We have held that even pro se litigants who fail to pay sanctions forfeit their ability to continue litigating. Support Systems International, Inc. v. Mack, 45 F.3d 185 (7th Cir.1995). Lawyers must be held to higher standards.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[a] lawyer who is unwilling, or unable, to pay accumulated sanctions must desist from practice until he can follow the court's orders.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.