United States v. Bartsh’s Empirical Analysis
69 F.3d 864 · 1995
Citation profile
53 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 94 later decisions — most recently July 2024 · most notably United States v. Lee (2004), United States v. Stuckey (2001)
53 federal appellate · 2 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2314 · 18 U.S.C. § 3742 · 18 U.S.C. § 645
Relies on United States v. Cornelius · Bethea v. Levi Strauss & Co. · United States v. Bartsh · Jaramillo v. Burkhart
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 94 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a decision in a prior appeal is followed in later proceedings unless a party introduces substantially different evidence, or the prior decision is clearly erroneous and works a manifest injustice.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“requires courts to adhere to decisions made in earlier proceedings in order to ensure uniformity of decisions, protect the expectations of the parties, and promote judicial economy.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“United States v. Cornelius, 968 F.2d 703 , 705 (8th Cir. 1992). On remand, however,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.