69 F. App'x 2 - Zgombic v. Farquharson’s Empirical Analysis
2003
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1226 (§ 236 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Demore District Director San Francisco District of Immigration and Naturalization Service et al. v. Kim · Rankine v. Reno · Aikens v. Reno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“explicating his understanding that the majority opinion may allow a challenge to detention when, for example, there has been unreasonable delay by the INS.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.