Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

69 F. App'x 642

Briggs v. Elevator Control Corp. (El Con)

U.S. Courts of Appeals

Decided July 24, 2003

This page is marked noindex.

U.S. Courts of Appeals · decided 2003-07-24

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion · Decided 2003-07-24

*643 PER CURIAM.

¶1 Andrea G. Briggs appeals the district court’s orders granting Respondents’ motions for summary judgment in her negligence action. We have carefully reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Briggs v. Elevator Control Corp., No. CA-01-1213CCB (D.Md. Feb. 26, 2002 and Mar. 11, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

¶2 AFFIRMED.

/69/fappx/642 · .json · Public domain