69 F. Supp. 2d 1310 - Whipple v. Herrera’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 2113 · 18 U.S.C. § 3621 · 18 U.S.C. § 3625 · 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 636
Relies on Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. · Reno v. Koray · National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. Boston & Maine Corp. · Bruce Downey v. Joseph Crabtree, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution · Federal Deposit Insurance v. Hulsey
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“As any determination by the BOP that Royal was eligible for a sentence reduction was erroneous, his actual status has not been retroactively changed. . . .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Zacher v. Tippy
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.