69 F. Supp. 2d 521 - Aiena v. Olsen’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
2 district · 2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 78C (§ 3 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78J (§ 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 15 U.S.C. § 78T (§ 20 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) · 26 U.S.C. § 1501 · 26 U.S.C. § 83 · 29 U.S.C. § 1001 (§ 2 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1003 (§ 4 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974) · 29 U.S.C. § 1054 (§ 204 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974)
Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United States · Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Mertens v. Hewitt Associates · Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. Green
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.