Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 FSUPP2D 546 - Camacho v. Brandon

Camacho v. Brandon’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
January 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1981 (Civil Rights Act of 1866) · 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Pickering v. Board of Education of Township High School District 205 Will County Illinois · Connick v. Myers · Elrod v. Burns · Singleton v. Wulff · Branti v. Finkel

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[d]efendants . . . have failed to comply with the spirit of Local Civil Rule 6.3, which requires a party seeking to move for reconsideration to serve its motion within ten days after the docketing of the court's determination of the original motion.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “even if the Court had dispensed with its requirement for a pre-motion conference, service would still have been untimely,”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.