69 F. Supp. 2d 996 - Buchanan v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 28 U.S.C. § 1361 · 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 406 (§ 206 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Hagans v. Lavine · Kentucky Department of Corrections v. Thompson · Heckler v. Ringer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“while Buchanan may have been deprived of additional income to which he was entitled, this deprivation does not rise to the level of a protected property interest under the Constitution.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.