Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 69 Haw. 438 - State v. Oshiro

State v. Oshiro’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
1
states following
May 2023
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently May 2023 · most notably State v. Dannenberg (1992), Evans v. Takao (1992)

30 state decisions

12019871990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Estrada · Gannett Pacific Corp. v. Richardson · State v. Ortiz · State v. Moniz · State v. Lo

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “only appeal in those limited instances established by HRS § 641-13”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Jurisdiction and powers. The supreme court shall have jurisdiction and powers as follows: [[Image here]] (4) To exercise original jurisdiction in all questions arising under writs directed to courts of inferior jurisdiction and returnable before the supreme court, or if the supreme court consents to receive the ease arising under writs of mandamus directed to public officers to compel them to fulfill the duties of their offices; and such other original jurisdiction as may be expressly conferred by law[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “in all criminal matters, ... [f]rom a pretrial order granting a motion for the suppression of evidence, including a confession or admission, ... in which case the appellate court shall give priority to the appeal and the order shall be stayed pending the outcome of the appeal.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.